<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2014 (3) TMI 1131 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275234</link>
    <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The ITAT emphasized the need for the CIT(A) to consider all relevant evidence and submissions provided by the assessee during the reassessment proceedings, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2014 (3) TMI 1131 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275234</link>
      <description>The ITAT allowed both appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issues back to the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication. The ITAT emphasized the need for the CIT(A) to consider all relevant evidence and submissions provided by the assessee during the reassessment proceedings, ensuring a fair opportunity for the assessee to present their case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2014 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275234</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>