<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1321 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275236</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues raised by the assessee in the additional grounds for fresh adjudication by the TPO/AO. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of the most appropriate method and selection of comparables. For assessment years 2007-08 to 2009-10, the TPO/AO were instructed to consider CBDT guidelines. The deduction under Section 10A and corporate matters were remanded for fresh consideration. The appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:21:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535711" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1321 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275236</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the issues raised by the assessee in the additional grounds for fresh adjudication by the TPO/AO. The Tribunal directed reconsideration of the most appropriate method and selection of comparables. For assessment years 2007-08 to 2009-10, the TPO/AO were instructed to consider CBDT guidelines. The deduction under Section 10A and corporate matters were remanded for fresh consideration. The appeals of the assessee were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275236</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>