<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1642 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275258</link>
    <description>Winding-up petitions under Section 433 are not maintainable where the alleged debt is bona fide disputed and the defence is substantial, because the phrase &#039;unable to pay its debts&#039; is applied commercially and winding up must not be used as a device for debt recovery; accordingly, a petitioner relying on unadmitted ledger entries and contested professional-fee claims has not shown inability to pay or erosion of the company&#039;s substratum. The dispute over liability requires evidence and trial, and absent material showing no reasonable prospect of continuing as a going concern, just and equitable grounds for winding up are not established.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2018 08:21:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535701" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1642 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275258</link>
      <description>Winding-up petitions under Section 433 are not maintainable where the alleged debt is bona fide disputed and the defence is substantial, because the phrase &#039;unable to pay its debts&#039; is applied commercially and winding up must not be used as a device for debt recovery; accordingly, a petitioner relying on unadmitted ledger entries and contested professional-fee claims has not shown inability to pay or erosion of the company&#039;s substratum. The dispute over liability requires evidence and trial, and absent material showing no reasonable prospect of continuing as a going concern, just and equitable grounds for winding up are not established.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275258</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>