https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367683 The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 1,06,88,435/- under "Sundry Creditors" was unjustified as the assessee had provided complete details and the Assessing Officer failed to follow proper procedures. Additionally, the rejection of additional evidence by the CIT(A) was deemed unwarranted, as the CIT(A) did not follow principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on 07/09/2018. en-us Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 17:13:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367683 The ITAT allowed the appeal of the assessee, setting aside the CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal held that the addition of Rs. 1,06,88,435/- under "Sundry Creditors" was unjustified as the assessee had provided complete details and the Assessing Officer failed to follow proper procedures. Additionally, the rejection of additional evidence by the CIT(A) was deemed unwarranted, as the CIT(A) did not follow principles of natural justice. The appeal was allowed in favor of the assessee on 07/09/2018. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 07 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367683