<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1408 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367672</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for payment of gratuity to LIC on an actual payment basis. The disallowance by the Assessing Officer was overturned, and both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed. The Tribunal held that the assessee had no control over the funds contributed to LIC for gratuity, and since the facts were identical to previous cases, the deduction was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 16:20:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535669" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1408 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367672</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the deduction for payment of gratuity to LIC on an actual payment basis. The disallowance by the Assessing Officer was overturned, and both the revenue&#039;s appeals and the assessee&#039;s cross objections were dismissed. The Tribunal held that the assessee had no control over the funds contributed to LIC for gratuity, and since the facts were identical to previous cases, the deduction was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>