<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1406 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367670</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the deduction of Direct Marketing Agent (DMA) commission for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2011-12, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the entire commission as a deduction. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow expenses on the issue of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) for the A.Y. 2008-09. The matter of disallowance under Section 14A was remanded to the AO for computation, and the disallowance of provision for leave encashment was deferred pending a Supreme Court decision. The disallowance of post-retirement benefits was rejected, while the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was upheld. The additional claim for adjustment on delinquency support receipts was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 09:12:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535666" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1406 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367670</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal on the deduction of Direct Marketing Agent (DMA) commission for the assessment years 2007-08, 2008-09, and 2011-12, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the entire commission as a deduction. The Tribunal also upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow expenses on the issue of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs) for the A.Y. 2008-09. The matter of disallowance under Section 14A was remanded to the AO for computation, and the disallowance of provision for leave encashment was deferred pending a Supreme Court decision. The disallowance of post-retirement benefits was rejected, while the disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) was upheld. The additional claim for adjustment on delinquency support receipts was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367670</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>