<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367661</link>
    <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2000-01. The ITAT found that since the addition on which the penalty was based had been deleted by the Commissioner, there was no valid basis for the penalty. Consequently, the penalty was directed to be deleted, and the decision was pronounced in Open Court.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 12:08:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535654" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1397 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367661</link>
      <description>The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) allowed the appeal, leading to the deletion of the penalty imposed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2000-01. The ITAT found that since the addition on which the penalty was based had been deleted by the Commissioner, there was no valid basis for the penalty. Consequently, the penalty was directed to be deleted, and the decision was pronounced in Open Court.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367661</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>