<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (3) TMI 1235 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275229</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of satisfaction recorded by the CIT(A) regarding the imposition of the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A)&#039;s satisfaction is essential before penalizing an assessee for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Despite the Department&#039;s argument citing the retrospective effect of section 271(1B), the Tribunal held that the CIT(A)&#039;s satisfaction, not the Assessing Officer&#039;s, is required for penalty initiation in cases of enhancement, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 12:14:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535631" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (3) TMI 1235 - ITAT AMRITSAR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275229</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal canceled the penalty imposed on the assessee under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act due to the lack of satisfaction recorded by the CIT(A) regarding the imposition of the penalty. The Tribunal emphasized that the CIT(A)&#039;s satisfaction is essential before penalizing an assessee for concealing income or furnishing inaccurate particulars. Despite the Department&#039;s argument citing the retrospective effect of section 271(1B), the Tribunal held that the CIT(A)&#039;s satisfaction, not the Assessing Officer&#039;s, is required for penalty initiation in cases of enhancement, leading to the dismissal of the Department&#039;s application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275229</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>