https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367653 The court dismissed the petition challenging the allotment of 40 acres of land to M/s. Patanjali Ayurvedic Ltd., finding the allotment in compliance with the Industrial Promotion Policy, 2014, and the M.P. State Industrial Land and Building Management Rules, 2015. The court held that the allotment aimed to promote industrial growth and employment generation, following transparent procedures. Additionally, the court rejected claims of constitutional violations and arbitrary land allotment, emphasizing the transparent and lawful nature of the allotment process. Previous PILs on the matter were also dismissed, with the court imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner for filing frivolous litigation. en-us Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:21:28 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367653 The court dismissed the petition challenging the allotment of 40 acres of land to M/s. Patanjali Ayurvedic Ltd., finding the allotment in compliance with the Industrial Promotion Policy, 2014, and the M.P. State Industrial Land and Building Management Rules, 2015. The court held that the allotment aimed to promote industrial growth and employment generation, following transparent procedures. Additionally, the court rejected claims of constitutional violations and arbitrary land allotment, emphasizing the transparent and lawful nature of the allotment process. Previous PILs on the matter were also dismissed, with the court imposing a cost of Rs. 10,000 on the petitioner for filing frivolous litigation. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 27 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367653