<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1378 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367642</link>
    <description>The appellant, engaged in exporting I.T. services, sought refunds for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal allowed the majority of the claimed refund, except for minor amounts denied due to incorrect naming on invoices and small denied amounts, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to most of the refund. The dispute mainly revolved around the cenvatability of catering services, with the Tribunal ultimately supporting the credit availed by the appellant based on established legal interpretations. The lack of detailed descriptions on some invoices was not deemed sufficient to disqualify the appellant from claiming the credit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:20:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1378 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367642</link>
      <description>The appellant, engaged in exporting I.T. services, sought refunds for service tax paid on input services. The Tribunal allowed the majority of the claimed refund, except for minor amounts denied due to incorrect naming on invoices and small denied amounts, affirming the appellant&#039;s entitlement to most of the refund. The dispute mainly revolved around the cenvatability of catering services, with the Tribunal ultimately supporting the credit availed by the appellant based on established legal interpretations. The lack of detailed descriptions on some invoices was not deemed sufficient to disqualify the appellant from claiming the credit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367642</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>