<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1376 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367640</link>
    <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of duty on the appellant&#039;s training services within the normal limitation period, as they were considered taxable under &quot;Commercial Coaching Or Training.&quot; Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside due to lack of clarity during the relevant period, with no finding of suppression or misstatement. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, upholding the demand but setting aside penalties under all sections.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Dec 2019 17:47:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535587" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1376 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367640</link>
      <description>The Tribunal confirmed the demand of duty on the appellant&#039;s training services within the normal limitation period, as they were considered taxable under &quot;Commercial Coaching Or Training.&quot; Penalties imposed on the appellant were set aside due to lack of clarity during the relevant period, with no finding of suppression or misstatement. The appeal was disposed of accordingly, upholding the demand but setting aside penalties under all sections.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367640</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>