<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1374 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367638</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for suppressing the value of Security Agency Services but set aside the demand and penalty for misclassification of services as Manpower Supply. The appeal was partially allowed, confirming accepted liability and penalty while rejecting the demand for services before 16.06.2005.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:20:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1374 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367638</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the appellant&#039;s liability for suppressing the value of Security Agency Services but set aside the demand and penalty for misclassification of services as Manpower Supply. The appeal was partially allowed, confirming accepted liability and penalty while rejecting the demand for services before 16.06.2005.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367638</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>