<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367631</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the imposition of penalties and the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of the service tax along with interest upon detection of irregularities, in line with the provisions of Section 73(3) of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:20:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535577" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1367 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367631</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the penalties imposed under Sections 77 and 78 of the Act. The decision was based on the lack of evidence supporting the imposition of penalties and the appellant&#039;s prompt payment of the service tax along with interest upon detection of irregularities, in line with the provisions of Section 73(3) of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>