<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1349 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367613</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availment of Cenvat credit on Iron &amp;amp; Steel articles and Welding Electrodes based on precedents. The denial of Cenvat credit on Cement for foundation work was rejected, citing favorable decisions. However, the denial of Cenvat credit on Light Fittings was upheld due to minimal amount involved. The penalty imposed was set aside as the denial of credit was overturned, and the issue with Light Fittings was deemed a genuine interpretation of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:19:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535556" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1349 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367613</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing the availment of Cenvat credit on Iron &amp;amp; Steel articles and Welding Electrodes based on precedents. The denial of Cenvat credit on Cement for foundation work was rejected, citing favorable decisions. However, the denial of Cenvat credit on Light Fittings was upheld due to minimal amount involved. The penalty imposed was set aside as the denial of credit was overturned, and the issue with Light Fittings was deemed a genuine interpretation of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367613</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>