<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1348 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367612</link>
    <description>The Tribunal clarified that the conditional exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 Central Excise dated 09.07.2004 required non-availment of Cenvat credit on inputs. It held that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 did not apply as the exemption was conditional, allowing the appellant to use unutilized Cenvat credit later. The appellant successfully utilized remaining credit for duty payment, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the conditional nature of the exemption and rejecting the argument for credit lapse.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535554" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1348 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367612</link>
      <description>The Tribunal clarified that the conditional exemption under Notification No. 30/2004 Central Excise dated 09.07.2004 required non-availment of Cenvat credit on inputs. It held that Rule 11(3) of the Cenvat Credit Rule, 2004 did not apply as the exemption was conditional, allowing the appellant to use unutilized Cenvat credit later. The appellant successfully utilized remaining credit for duty payment, with the Tribunal ruling in their favor. The Tribunal allowed the appeals of the assessees and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, emphasizing the conditional nature of the exemption and rejecting the argument for credit lapse.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367612</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>