<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1344 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367608</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal concluded that the findings of clandestine removal based on shortages detected could not be upheld, considering the information provided to the Revenue about the new plots and the excess raw materials found at the unregistered premises.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 08:19:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535549" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1344 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367608</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal with consequential relief. The Tribunal concluded that the findings of clandestine removal based on shortages detected could not be upheld, considering the information provided to the Revenue about the new plots and the excess raw materials found at the unregistered premises.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367608</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>