<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (10) TMI 2734 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275222</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue. It upheld the treatment of the sale of shares as long-term capital gains, ruling that the transaction was not a colorable device. The Tribunal also deemed the reopening of the assessment invalid, citing non-disclosure of material facts and the time limitation under section 147 of the Act. The judgments emphasized compliance with legal formalities and accurate application of capital gains tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:33:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535548" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (10) TMI 2734 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275222</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed both appeals by the Revenue. It upheld the treatment of the sale of shares as long-term capital gains, ruling that the transaction was not a colorable device. The Tribunal also deemed the reopening of the assessment invalid, citing non-disclosure of material facts and the time limitation under section 147 of the Act. The judgments emphasized compliance with legal formalities and accurate application of capital gains tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>