FIRST FORMAL NOTICE U.S. 143.2 – LONG TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED- time allowed of few days is un-necessarily putting pressure on all- is it just to harass assesses and tax professionals?

FIRST FORMAL NOTICE U.S. 143.2 – LONG TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED- time allowed of few days is un-necessarily putting pressure on all- is it just to harass assesses and tax professionals? https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8175 The article criticises short timeframes in the formal notice under section 143(2) for scrutiny selection, noting that fixed hearing dates set shortly after notice impose unnecessary pressure on taxpayers and professionals while actual hearings are delayed by administrative backlogs. It explains that hurried deadlines cause duplicate document submissions, adjournment burdens, and instances where notices are received after the scheduled hearing, and proposes aligning notice hearing dates with realistic scheduling and issuing intermediate procedural requests before fixing hearings. en-us Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:32:38 +0530 Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:32:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator FIRST FORMAL NOTICE U.S. 143.2 – LONG TIME SHOULD BE ALLOWED- time allowed of few days is un-necessarily putting pressure on all- is it just to harass assesses and tax professionals? https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8175 The article criticises short timeframes in the formal notice under section 143(2) for scrutiny selection, noting that fixed hearing dates set shortly after notice impose unnecessary pressure on taxpayers and professionals while actual hearings are delayed by administrative backlogs. It explains that hurried deadlines cause duplicate document submissions, adjournment burdens, and instances where notices are received after the scheduled hearing, and proposes aligning notice hearing dates with realistic scheduling and issuing intermediate procedural requests before fixing hearings. Articles Income Tax Mon, 24 Sep 2018 07:32:38 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=8175