<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1607 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275221</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s enhancement of income by Rs. 1 lac for the disallowance of expenditure related to a penalty imposed by Custom Authorities. The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed in 2006 could not be justified for the assessment year 2000-01, leading to the dismissal of the enhancement. The appeal was partly allowed, with other grounds not pursued being dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:15:06 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535532" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1607 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275221</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)&#039;s enhancement of income by Rs. 1 lac for the disallowance of expenditure related to a penalty imposed by Custom Authorities. The Tribunal found that the penalty imposed in 2006 could not be justified for the assessment year 2000-01, leading to the dismissal of the enhancement. The appeal was partly allowed, with other grounds not pursued being dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275221</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>