<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (10) TMI 35 - DELHI High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14551</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the provision for retrenchment compensation and gratuity made by the assessee did not represent an accrued liability for the assessment year 1972-73. As the liability was contingent and not ascertainable in praesenti during the relevant year, the deduction claim was disallowed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:27:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53551" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (10) TMI 35 - DELHI High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14551</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the provision for retrenchment compensation and gratuity made by the assessee did not represent an accrued liability for the assessment year 1972-73. As the liability was contingent and not ascertainable in praesenti during the relevant year, the deduction claim was disallowed, affirming the Tribunal&#039;s decision in favor of the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14551</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>