https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14550 The High Court directed the Tax Recovery Officer to adjudicate the petitioner's claim under rule 11, considering possession rights and transfer timing independently of the Assessing Officer's declaration under section 281. The petitioner was instructed to file objections within two weeks, ensuring a fair examination of the claim based on relevant documents. The court maintained the attachment pending adjudication, allowing the petitioner to challenge the gift deed's voidness under rule 11, emphasizing due process and the petitioner's right to contest the transfer's validity. en-us Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 17 Jul 2009 11:24:59 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14550 The High Court directed the Tax Recovery Officer to adjudicate the petitioner's claim under rule 11, considering possession rights and transfer timing independently of the Assessing Officer's declaration under section 281. The petitioner was instructed to file objections within two weeks, ensuring a fair examination of the claim based on relevant documents. The court maintained the attachment pending adjudication, allowing the petitioner to challenge the gift deed's voidness under rule 11, emphasizing due process and the petitioner's right to contest the transfer's validity. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14550