<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1309 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367573</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted by the Tribunal due to the substantial delay in filing the appeal and the defective notice issued by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice over technicalities and held that penalties based on defective notices cannot be sustained. The decision was pronounced on 19/09/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:10:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535482" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1309 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367573</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, and the penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) was deleted by the Tribunal due to the substantial delay in filing the appeal and the defective notice issued by the Assessing Officer. The Tribunal emphasized substantial justice over technicalities and held that penalties based on defective notices cannot be sustained. The decision was pronounced on 19/09/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367573</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>