<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1298 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367562</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition as not maintainable, ruling that the applicant did not qualify as a &quot;financial creditor&quot; and the claimed debt did not meet the definition of a &quot;financial debt&quot;. The Tribunal clarified that its findings should not be seen as an opinion on the underlying dispute, and the applicant&#039;s rights before other forums were unaffected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 11:28:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535468" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1298 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367562</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the petition as not maintainable, ruling that the applicant did not qualify as a &quot;financial creditor&quot; and the claimed debt did not meet the definition of a &quot;financial debt&quot;. The Tribunal clarified that its findings should not be seen as an opinion on the underlying dispute, and the applicant&#039;s rights before other forums were unaffected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>