<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1284 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367548</link>
    <description>The High Court overturned the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the accused in a case involving dishonored cheques for electrical goods. The High Court found that the trial court misappreciated evidence and failed to properly evaluate the testimonies and documents presented. The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The accused was directed to appear for sentencing on a specified date.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:07:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1284 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367548</link>
      <description>The High Court overturned the trial court&#039;s acquittal of the accused in a case involving dishonored cheques for electrical goods. The High Court found that the trial court misappreciated evidence and failed to properly evaluate the testimonies and documents presented. The accused was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, and the impugned judgment was set aside. The accused was directed to appear for sentencing on a specified date.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367548</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>