<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1280 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367544</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, remanding the case to the original authority to decide the refund claims within three months. The Commissioner(Appeals) was deemed to have violated the principles of natural justice by not providing a hearing opportunity, and incorrectly applying notifications other than Notification No.12/2013-ST for SEZ units. Emphasizing the overriding nature of the SEZ Act and the need for a liberal approach in condoning delays for SEZ units, the Tribunal allowed all appeals through remand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 17:06:48 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1280 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367544</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, remanding the case to the original authority to decide the refund claims within three months. The Commissioner(Appeals) was deemed to have violated the principles of natural justice by not providing a hearing opportunity, and incorrectly applying notifications other than Notification No.12/2013-ST for SEZ units. Emphasizing the overriding nature of the SEZ Act and the need for a liberal approach in condoning delays for SEZ units, the Tribunal allowed all appeals through remand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367544</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>