<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1279 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367543</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand for lease agreements with Railways entered before 16.05.2008. Emphasizing the timing of the agreements predating the introduction of the taxable service category, the Tribunal held that no liability for service tax arises for events occurring before the specified taxable service&#039;s enactment. Citing precedent and a Board&#039;s letter, the Tribunal concluded that since the lease agreements were one-time events before the taxable service introduction, the appellant was not liable to pay service tax. Both appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 06:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535443" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1279 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367543</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the service tax demand for lease agreements with Railways entered before 16.05.2008. Emphasizing the timing of the agreements predating the introduction of the taxable service category, the Tribunal held that no liability for service tax arises for events occurring before the specified taxable service&#039;s enactment. Citing precedent and a Board&#039;s letter, the Tribunal concluded that since the lease agreements were one-time events before the taxable service introduction, the appellant was not liable to pay service tax. Both appeals were allowed, providing relief to the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367543</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>