https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275218 The Punjab Act was examined for repugnancy against the Indian Contract Act, the Code of Civil Procedure and the Indian Limitation Act under Section 107(1) of the Constitution Act. The text explains that saving provisions in Section 37 of the Contract Act, Sections 9 and 4 of the CPC, and Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act preserve special or local laws and special procedures. As the Act did not expressly or necessarily remove mortgagee rights under Sections 69 and 70 of the Contract Act, and the central statutes themselves contained saving language, the Act was not inoperative on repugnancy grounds. en-us Fri, 10 Apr 1942 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:02:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275218 The Punjab Act was examined for repugnancy against the Indian Contract Act, the Code of Civil Procedure and the Indian Limitation Act under Section 107(1) of the Constitution Act. The text explains that saving provisions in Section 37 of the Contract Act, Sections 9 and 4 of the CPC, and Section 29(2) of the Limitation Act preserve special or local laws and special procedures. As the Act did not expressly or necessarily remove mortgagee rights under Sections 69 and 70 of the Contract Act, and the central statutes themselves contained saving language, the Act was not inoperative on repugnancy grounds. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 10 Apr 1942 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275218