https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275217 Under the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, land used or capable of being used for raising valuable plants, trees or other husbandry purposes was treated as agricultural land, so a mango grove fell outside the widow's statutory share. The widow's ordinary Hindu law right to maintenance was held to survive where the Act did not displace succession to the entire estate, although her share in the non-agricultural estate had to be considered in fixing maintenance. Common family liabilities were to be apportioned between the agricultural and non-agricultural assets by value, partnership assets had to be accounted for in the widow's favour, and mesne profits ran only from the date of suit. en-us Fri, 04 Feb 1944 00:00:00 +0630 Sat, 22 Sep 2018 12:52:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275217 Under the Hindu Women's Rights to Property Act, 1937, land used or capable of being used for raising valuable plants, trees or other husbandry purposes was treated as agricultural land, so a mango grove fell outside the widow's statutory share. The widow's ordinary Hindu law right to maintenance was held to survive where the Act did not displace succession to the entire estate, although her share in the non-agricultural estate had to be considered in fixing maintenance. Common family liabilities were to be apportioned between the agricultural and non-agricultural assets by value, partnership assets had to be accounted for in the widow's favour, and mesne profits ran only from the date of suit. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 04 Feb 1944 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275217