<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (10) TMI 966 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275216</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the amount received under the non-competition agreement should be treated as a revenue receipt, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed, and the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of the amount as a revenue receipt.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:48:49 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535391" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (10) TMI 966 - HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275216</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the amount received under the non-competition agreement should be treated as a revenue receipt, overturning the Tribunal&#039;s decision and restoring the Assessing Officer&#039;s order. The appeal by the Revenue challenging the Tribunal&#039;s order was dismissed, and the High Court set aside the Tribunal&#039;s decision, affirming the Assessing Officer&#039;s treatment of the amount as a revenue receipt.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275216</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>