<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1946 (7) TMI 3 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275213</link>
    <description>A company was treated as a Canadian debtor for withholding purposes where residence, not nationality, governed the statutory expression; because its business, control, meetings, and dividend-generating income were in Canada, the withholding duty applied. The statutory obligation to deduct and remit tax was held mandatory, and uncertainty about whether a ministerial receipt would operate as a defence in every foreign forum did not excuse compliance. The tax on non-resident shareholders was also upheld as intra vires, as Parliament had authority to legislate for taxation even with extra-territorial effect. The taxing and withholding provisions were therefore valid in their application.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 11:20:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535378" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1946 (7) TMI 3 - PRIVY COUNCIL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275213</link>
      <description>A company was treated as a Canadian debtor for withholding purposes where residence, not nationality, governed the statutory expression; because its business, control, meetings, and dividend-generating income were in Canada, the withholding duty applied. The statutory obligation to deduct and remit tax was held mandatory, and uncertainty about whether a ministerial receipt would operate as a defence in every foreign forum did not excuse compliance. The tax on non-resident shareholders was also upheld as intra vires, as Parliament had authority to legislate for taxation even with extra-territorial effect. The taxing and withholding provisions were therefore valid in their application.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 1946 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>