<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (11) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14537</link>
    <description>The court upheld the legality of the recovery actions taken by the Assessing Officer for tax arrears, finding that the retention and encashment of fixed deposit receipts were lawful. The petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the Settlement Commission&#039;s order to pay tax and interest resulted in valid recovery proceedings. The court dismissed the writ petitions and related miscellaneous petitions, ruling in favor of the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 10:56:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53537" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (11) TMI 15 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14537</link>
      <description>The court upheld the legality of the recovery actions taken by the Assessing Officer for tax arrears, finding that the retention and encashment of fixed deposit receipts were lawful. The petitioner&#039;s failure to comply with the Settlement Commission&#039;s order to pay tax and interest resulted in valid recovery proceedings. The court dismissed the writ petitions and related miscellaneous petitions, ruling in favor of the Assessing Officer&#039;s actions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>