<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (11) TMI 1711 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275208</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the lack of approval by Secured Creditors for the Scheme of Amalgamation. The Chairperson and scrutinizer reports highlighted deficiencies in proxies and incomplete documentation, rendering the proxies invalid. The applicant&#039;s subsequent changes to the Scheme were not approved by Secured Creditors, leading to the rejection of the application. The Tribunal advised the Applicant to revise the Scheme and file a new Company petition for approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 13:17:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535360" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (11) TMI 1711 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275208</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the application due to the lack of approval by Secured Creditors for the Scheme of Amalgamation. The Chairperson and scrutinizer reports highlighted deficiencies in proxies and incomplete documentation, rendering the proxies invalid. The applicant&#039;s subsequent changes to the Scheme were not approved by Secured Creditors, leading to the rejection of the application. The Tribunal advised the Applicant to revise the Scheme and file a new Company petition for approval.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275208</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>