<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 1184 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275209</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the respondent-assessee&#039;s claim for Cenvat Credit under the Central Excise Act, 1944 for services related to business activities, including courier services, distinguishing them from outward transportation services by a goods transport agency. The Tribunal clarified that courier services, provided by agencies like Safe Express Pvt. Ltd. and Speedage Express Cargo Service, qualify as &quot;Input Services&quot; eligible for Cenvat Credit, distinct from GTA services. The appeal challenging this decision was dismissed for lack of merit and failure to raise substantial legal questions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2018 06:12:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535359" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 1184 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275209</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision allowing the respondent-assessee&#039;s claim for Cenvat Credit under the Central Excise Act, 1944 for services related to business activities, including courier services, distinguishing them from outward transportation services by a goods transport agency. The Tribunal clarified that courier services, provided by agencies like Safe Express Pvt. Ltd. and Speedage Express Cargo Service, qualify as &quot;Input Services&quot; eligible for Cenvat Credit, distinct from GTA services. The appeal challenging this decision was dismissed for lack of merit and failure to raise substantial legal questions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275209</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>