https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275199 The State could not lawfully approve a select list in part and reject the remaining names on the same grounds, because recruitment rules and the constitutional role of the Public Service Commission require bona fide, recorded reasons for refusing approval. Mere inclusion in a select list does not create an indefeasible right to appointment, and approval does not itself confer immediate appointment. However, relief was unavailable because the select list had expired under the rules and the claim was pursued after substantial delay, making any direction for approval or appointment ineffective and inequitable. en-us Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 21 Sep 2018 16:14:49 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275199 The State could not lawfully approve a select list in part and reject the remaining names on the same grounds, because recruitment rules and the constitutional role of the Public Service Commission require bona fide, recorded reasons for refusing approval. Mere inclusion in a select list does not create an indefeasible right to appointment, and approval does not itself confer immediate appointment. However, relief was unavailable because the select list had expired under the rules and the claim was pursued after substantial delay, making any direction for approval or appointment ineffective and inequitable. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 15 Apr 1993 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275199