<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1259 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367523</link>
    <description>The High Court directed the respondent to release the goods upon the petitioner furnishing an indemnity bond for the tax assessed. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle related to the correct invoice that was mistakenly seized. The writ petition was disposed of, granting relief to the petitioner based on the understanding of the mistake and the genuine nature of the transaction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2025 16:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535286" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1259 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367523</link>
      <description>The High Court directed the respondent to release the goods upon the petitioner furnishing an indemnity bond for the tax assessed. The Court ordered the immediate release of the goods and the vehicle related to the correct invoice that was mistakenly seized. The writ petition was disposed of, granting relief to the petitioner based on the understanding of the mistake and the genuine nature of the transaction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>