<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1254 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367518</link>
    <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere because the tax effect was low. The Court expressly left the question of law open and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on that ground. The order does not decide the underlying income tax issue on merits, and no substantive legal conclusion was recorded beyond the low-tax-effect disposal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:26:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1254 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367518</link>
      <description>Delay was condoned, and the Supreme Court declined to interfere because the tax effect was low. The Court expressly left the question of law open and dismissed the Special Leave Petition on that ground. The order does not decide the underlying income tax issue on merits, and no substantive legal conclusion was recorded beyond the low-tax-effect disposal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367518</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>