<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1231 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367495</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) to reassess the valuation of the properties as on the date of the agreement to sell. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of Section 43CA(4) should not apply retrospectively to agreements executed before April 1, 2013.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 22:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535258" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1231 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367495</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, and the matter was remanded to the CIT(A) to reassess the valuation of the properties as on the date of the agreement to sell. The Tribunal emphasized that the provisions of Section 43CA(4) should not apply retrospectively to agreements executed before April 1, 2013.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367495</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>