<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1228 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367492</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, declaring a moratorium and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The petition was deemed compliant with statutory provisions, and the Operational Creditor proved the default by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the case outcome in favor of the Operational Creditor.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:25:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535255" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1228 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367492</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the petition under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, declaring a moratorium and appointing an Interim Resolution Professional to initiate the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process. The petition was deemed compliant with statutory provisions, and the Operational Creditor proved the default by the Corporate Debtor, leading to the case outcome in favor of the Operational Creditor.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367492</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>