<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1223 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367487</link>
    <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge as a &#039;related party&#039; was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority, upholding the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant, an assignee of a Promoter, was deemed a &#039;related party&#039; due to the strategic debt assignment to reduce the State Bank of India&#039;s influence. The assignment transferred rights and liabilities, making the appellant liable as the assignor. The judgment highlighted that the appellant assumed the assignor&#039;s position, justifying the &#039;related party&#039; classification. The appeal lacked merit, leading to its dismissal without costs awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:24:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535250" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1223 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367487</link>
      <description>The appellant&#039;s challenge as a &#039;related party&#039; was dismissed by the Adjudicating Authority, upholding the National Company Law Tribunal&#039;s decision. The appellant, an assignee of a Promoter, was deemed a &#039;related party&#039; due to the strategic debt assignment to reduce the State Bank of India&#039;s influence. The assignment transferred rights and liabilities, making the appellant liable as the assignor. The judgment highlighted that the appellant assumed the assignor&#039;s position, justifying the &#039;related party&#039; classification. The appeal lacked merit, leading to its dismissal without costs awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367487</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>