<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1211 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367475</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue. The decision distinguished between Business Auxiliary Service and Information Technology Service under the Finance Act, 1994, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the services provided were related to the operation of computer systems, falling under Information Technology Service and exempt from Business Auxiliary Service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:23:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535238" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1211 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367475</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals filed by the assessee, dismissing the appeals filed by the Revenue. The decision distinguished between Business Auxiliary Service and Information Technology Service under the Finance Act, 1994, ruling in favor of the assessee. The Tribunal concluded that the services provided were related to the operation of computer systems, falling under Information Technology Service and exempt from Business Auxiliary Service. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the orders confirming the demand for service tax, interest, and penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367475</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>