<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1192 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367456</link>
    <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE remained available where commercial production had already been conclusively found to have commenced before the prescribed cut-off date. The earlier finding in the assessee&#039;s own case governed the subsequent period, and no contrary basis was shown to displace that concluded determination. On that footing, denial of the exemption was unsustainable, the demand could not be maintained, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2019 12:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535219" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1192 - CESTAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367456</link>
      <description>Area-based exemption under Notification No. 50/2003-CE remained available where commercial production had already been conclusively found to have commenced before the prescribed cut-off date. The earlier finding in the assessee&#039;s own case governed the subsequent period, and no contrary basis was shown to displace that concluded determination. On that footing, denial of the exemption was unsustainable, the demand could not be maintained, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367456</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>