<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (12) TMI 1605 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275183</link>
    <description>A meeting of secured creditors under a company scheme may be reconvened when it could not be held because no creditor attended and the failure was not attributable to the applicant companies. The Tribunal noted compliance with the earlier directions, accepted the chairperson&#039;s report, and relied on the scheme provisions, the Companies Act, 2013, the arrangement and amalgamation rules, and its inherent power under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. As no prejudice would be caused to stakeholders, a fresh meeting was permitted so the secured creditors could record their assent or dissent to the proposed scheme.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535208" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (12) TMI 1605 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275183</link>
      <description>A meeting of secured creditors under a company scheme may be reconvened when it could not be held because no creditor attended and the failure was not attributable to the applicant companies. The Tribunal noted compliance with the earlier directions, accepted the chairperson&#039;s report, and relied on the scheme provisions, the Companies Act, 2013, the arrangement and amalgamation rules, and its inherent power under Rule 11 of the NCLT Rules, 2016. As no prejudice would be caused to stakeholders, a fresh meeting was permitted so the secured creditors could record their assent or dissent to the proposed scheme.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275183</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>