<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1703 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275185</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the CESTAT&#039;s refusal to adjudicate the appeal challenging the original order was vacated. The CESTAT was directed to consider the appeal against both the original and addendum orders. The parties were instructed to appear for further proceedings, ensuring all relevant issues raised in the appeal were addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535206" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1703 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275185</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the CESTAT&#039;s refusal to adjudicate the appeal challenging the original order was vacated. The CESTAT was directed to consider the appeal against both the original and addendum orders. The parties were instructed to appear for further proceedings, ensuring all relevant issues raised in the appeal were addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>