<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (4) TMI 1400 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275186</link>
    <description>Allegations arising from bullion trading arrangements under a memorandum of understanding, together with parallel civil and arbitral proceedings, were examined to see whether they disclosed prima facie cheating, conspiracy, falsification of accounts and criminal misconduct. Although the record showed accounting irregularities and management lapses, it did not establish with sufficient certainty the petitioners&#039; dishonest intention, specific role, authority over deposits and borrowings, or any proven pecuniary advantage. On that basis, the allegations were treated as insufficient to sustain the criminal case, and continuation of the prosecution was found to be an abuse of process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2018 08:22:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535205" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (4) TMI 1400 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275186</link>
      <description>Allegations arising from bullion trading arrangements under a memorandum of understanding, together with parallel civil and arbitral proceedings, were examined to see whether they disclosed prima facie cheating, conspiracy, falsification of accounts and criminal misconduct. Although the record showed accounting irregularities and management lapses, it did not establish with sufficient certainty the petitioners&#039; dishonest intention, specific role, authority over deposits and borrowings, or any proven pecuniary advantage. On that basis, the allegations were treated as insufficient to sustain the criminal case, and continuation of the prosecution was found to be an abuse of process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>