<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (10) TMI 11 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14519</link>
    <description>The Gujarat HC noted that questions on block assessment, undisclosed income, commission payments, depreciation, and interest-related additions did not give rise to referable questions of law where the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions rested on appreciation of evidence and settled principles. It affirmed that block assessment operates separately from regular assessment, but disclosed income or expenditure already appearing in the return or regular books cannot be recast as undisclosed income merely on a different view of the same material. Findings on the genuineness of liaison services, business use of renovated premises, and related factual records were treated as matters of fact, and no perversity was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:15:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=53519" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (10) TMI 11 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14519</link>
      <description>The Gujarat HC noted that questions on block assessment, undisclosed income, commission payments, depreciation, and interest-related additions did not give rise to referable questions of law where the Tribunal&#039;s conclusions rested on appreciation of evidence and settled principles. It affirmed that block assessment operates separately from regular assessment, but disclosed income or expenditure already appearing in the return or regular books cannot be recast as undisclosed income merely on a different view of the same material. Findings on the genuineness of liaison services, business use of renovated premises, and related factual records were treated as matters of fact, and no perversity was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 18 Oct 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=14519</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>