<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2011 (3) TMI 1765 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275174</link>
    <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions to the Tribunal to reconsider the case in light of the factual position and to address the interest expenditure deduction issue raised under section 56 of the Act. The Court noted errors in relying on a judgment subsequently overruled by the Bombay High Court and in not initially addressing the interest expenditure deduction. Both parties acknowledged the oversight, leading to modifications in the orders to reflect that the issues raised were covered by a specific judgment of the Court in a related case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 17:40:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535183" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2011 (3) TMI 1765 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275174</link>
      <description>The appeal was disposed of with directions to the Tribunal to reconsider the case in light of the factual position and to address the interest expenditure deduction issue raised under section 56 of the Act. The Court noted errors in relying on a judgment subsequently overruled by the Bombay High Court and in not initially addressing the interest expenditure deduction. Both parties acknowledged the oversight, leading to modifications in the orders to reflect that the issues raised were covered by a specific judgment of the Court in a related case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275174</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>