https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275162 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in a case involving an insurance coverage dispute for damaged property. The Court held that since the exclusion clause was not communicated to the appellant, the insurance company could not rely on it. Additionally, the Court rejected the insurance company's attempt to introduce a new ground in the appeal, ruling that parties cannot bring in new facts at that stage. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the National Commission's decision and reinstated the State Commission's ruling, with each party to bear their own costs. en-us Tue, 22 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Sep 2018 12:41:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275162 The Supreme Court allowed the appeal in a case involving an insurance coverage dispute for damaged property. The Court held that since the exclusion clause was not communicated to the appellant, the insurance company could not rely on it. Additionally, the Court rejected the insurance company's attempt to introduce a new ground in the appeal, ruling that parties cannot bring in new facts at that stage. Consequently, the Supreme Court set aside the National Commission's decision and reinstated the State Commission's ruling, with each party to bear their own costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 22 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=275162