<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (9) TMI 1173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367437</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of charges and deduction u/s 80HHC, finding no concealment or inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee. The judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court was referenced to emphasize that the tax paid under section 115JB was based on the income assessed, making the penalty unjustified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was deemed unwarranted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:23:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=535112" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (9) TMI 1173 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367437</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) for disallowance of charges and deduction u/s 80HHC, finding no concealment or inaccurate particulars furnished by the assessee. The judgment of the Hon&#039;ble Delhi High Court was referenced to emphasize that the tax paid under section 115JB was based on the income assessed, making the penalty unjustified. The appeal of the assessee was allowed, and the penalty was deemed unwarranted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Sep 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367437</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>