https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367404 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as time-barred. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim of not receiving the Order-in-Original on time. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal due to the limitation period for filing appeals. The Tribunal upheld this decision, citing a Supreme Court judgment that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone delays beyond one month. The appeal was dismissed based on the established law, and the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:21:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367404 The appeal was dismissed by the Tribunal as time-barred. The appellant failed to provide evidence supporting their claim of not receiving the Order-in-Original on time. The Commissioner (Appeals) rejected the appeal due to the limitation period for filing appeals. The Tribunal upheld this decision, citing a Supreme Court judgment that the Commissioner (Appeals) cannot condone delays beyond one month. The appeal was dismissed based on the established law, and the Tribunal found no reason to interfere with the decision. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367404