https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367402 The appeal was partly allowed by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI, granting the refund claim for a specific invoice that met the relevancy criteria based on the interpretation of relevant dates in the context of service export completion. The decision aligned with the principles outlined by the Larger Bench, while not addressing the claims that were not pursued by the assessee. Consequently, the appellant received relief only for the mentioned invoice, with no findings provided for the unaddressed claims. en-us Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 20 Sep 2018 08:21:16 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367402 The appeal was partly allowed by the Member (Judicial) of the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT CHENNAI, granting the refund claim for a specific invoice that met the relevancy criteria based on the interpretation of relevant dates in the context of service export completion. The decision aligned with the principles outlined by the Larger Bench, while not addressing the claims that were not pursued by the assessee. Consequently, the appellant received relief only for the mentioned invoice, with no findings provided for the unaddressed claims. Case-Laws Service Tax Fri, 29 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=367402